What is Contingency Recruiting: How It Works and Benefits
14/12/2025
Direct Hire vs Contract to Hire: Which Is Better for Your Business?
14/12/2025Jeff Bezos, Founder, Amazon, said, “What’s dangerous is not to evolve. In the modern world, if you’re not constantly experimenting, you’re falling behind.”
In the new era, businesses strive to stay ahead in the fast-paced market and seek rapid scaling, cost reduction, and global talent acquisition. Are you keen on setting up a GCC as well? Let us help you understand the intricate details of the two pillars of GCC that have proven to hold it upright. They are Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) and a fully In-House GCC. The pathway created by both models can provide you with a winning streak as they are both epitomes of efficiency, innovation and outstanding operations. However, the experiences of the journey to the top are different.
Let us delve into a detailed understanding of both models and understand which works better:
What is the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Model for GCC Setup?
A BOT model is a specialised partnership that facilitates collaboration with organisations and offers comprehensive services to set up, manage, and offer the client a full-fledged functional GCC. If you want to collaborate with a BOT model partner, then you must know how it works:
- The first phase is the building phase, where the provider helps clients to set up the infrastructure, from setting up IT and tech structures to deciding on and setting up physical office spaces. They also help with handling the legal framework, compliance and regulation adherence.
- The second phase is where the partner handles the daily functions of the organisation, like management, HR compliance operations, etc, catering to the client’s requirements and ensuring efficiency and smooth operations.
- The third phase is when the partner transfers everything, like systems, assets, manpower and operational ownership to the client based on an agreement. The client now takes full control of the operational GCC.
According to Everest Group data, BOT-style setups have risen from under 10% a few years ago to account for approximately 40% of new GCC setups in India.
What Defines an In-House GCC? Structure, Ownership & Governance?
An in-house GCC is a unit of a multinational enterprise that is controlled and totally operated by the parent organisation and is set up in a region that is cost-efficient, possessing a rich talent bank essential to handling crucial operations, powering innovation, and developing unique competencies for the parent organisation. In-house GCC meaning and structure can be explained with the key characteristics that are:
Parent firm regains full ownership of all the assets, legal rights, infrastructure, and outcomes of the GCC unit.
The parent firm also has full rights over operational decisions, systems quality benchmarks, etc.
Intellectual Property-related information and data are retained within the corporate structure. The information is critical to business decision-making and functions.
The objectives and culture of the GCC are completely in tune with those of the parent enterprise.
1. Structure
The GCC structure is like that of the parent organisation in terms of hierarchy, like there will be head who ensures that functions and processes are well aligned with the global head office goals. Then there are departmental heads who report to the head of the centre. Finally, there are interdepartmental teams that are responsible for smooth collaboration and communication across segments.
A robust legal entity is designed for the parent organisation to function in the host country, and usually, the model known as a Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) is used to establish a solid legal presence. There are other models like (JV), Branch Office, or Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), each adhering to the laws and regulations.
2. Ownership and Administration
The legal ownership lies with the parent company, and they are in full control of all the functions, legal responsibilities, etc. For effectively managing the GCC, a strong governance structure is crucial, and it must cater to the framework of the parent company.
Roles and reporting points between the head office and GCCs must be defined and highlighted clearly. There must be proper KPIs formulated for gauging performance and quality. One of the most significant aspects governance structures must ensure is that the GCC is complying with the data policies, laws and rules.
BOT vs. In-House GCC: What are the Key Differences in Cost, Control & Scalability?
| Category | BOT (Build–Operate–Transfer Model) | In-House GCC (Global Capability Centre) |
| Setup Time | Fast setup using the partner’s existing infrastructure | Slower; requires building operations from the ground up |
| Initial Cost | Primary investment is low | Steep initial investment |
| Long-Term Cost | Post-transfer cost might be high | Generally lower long-term operating costs |
| Control | Limited during the “Operate” phase; full control only after transfer | Full control from day one |
| Talent Management | Recruitment and management are handled by the service provider | Fully managed internally; aligns with company culture |
| Operational Flexibility | Processes influenced by partner methodologies | Customised processes and tools |
| Risk Exposure | Lower early risk (shared with partner) | Higher initial operational and compliance risk |
| Scalability | Rapid scaling through the partner’s mature setup | Scales based on internal capacity and strategy |
| Speed to Productivity | High; partner brings ready teams & systems | Slower ramp-up; depends on internal readiness |
| Innovation Potential | Moderate; depends on partner’s capabilities | High; GCC becomes a strategic innovation hub |
| Governance & Compliance | Managed with shared oversight | Fully controlled internally with strict governance |
| Exit/Transition Complexity | The transfer phase may cause short-term disruptions | No transfer; stable long-term operations |
When Should Enterprises Choose the BOT Model? Practical Use Cases
If you are an enterprise keen on acquiring speed and specialised knowledge for your GCC, you need to resort to the BOT model. This way, you don’t have to lose your long-term ownership, but u will receive the required advantages. Let us look at some of the scenarios that might drive you to choose BOT:
1. Stepping into a New Market
If your organisation is venturing into new locations or latent rich hubs like India, and you want a speedy completion of your GCC setup, then the ideal model is BOT.
Use Case- Global FMCG leader Philips adopted a BOT partnership to establish and scale operations in India before transitioning to a fully owned capability centre.
2. Internal Teams with Limited Competencies
If your company leaders want to set up a GCC but the internal teams aren’t competent enough in terms of experience, resources, etc, then a BOT partner can help you with the problem.
Use case- UK-based retail enterprise needed niche IT, finance, and analytics skills that were not available internally in the UK. They partnered with BOT, established operations, and eventually, Tesco Bengaluru was formed.
3. Immediate Scaling Requirements
BOT models enable companies to scale speedily than internal teams, especially in the areas of engineering, finance, analytics, etc.
Use case- Google required to ramp up their engineering and support capabilities during initial expansion periods, BOT facilitated their rapid expansion process in new regions.
4. Need to Access Niche Talent
BOT partners have extensive networks and a broad talent bank with niche and qualified professionals. If you require immediate help with specialised talent, they can instantly support you.
Use case- Intel partnered with an India-based BOT as semiconductor engineering talent (VLSI, ASIC design, validation) is scanty globally. The company wanted access to deep engineering talent pools quickly.
5. Requirement of a Cost-Effective Channel
The initial costs of a BOT model are low, supporting businesses with budget constraints or slow approvals.
Why do High-Growth Companies Prefer In-House GCCs? Benefits & Long-Term Value
Let us check out some of the benefits of the in-house GCC model, driving high-value companies towards growth:
1. Direct Operational Control
In-house GCC models provide complete ownership to the parent company, which can be in charge of decision making, operations, systems, etc, ensuring that the GCC goals and vision are in sync with that of the parent company.
2. Upgraded IT and Data Measures
Companies dealing with sensitive data and IP, like tech and product firms, can adopt an in-house GCC model, as it will enable them to diminish data leaks and breach possibilities. All the data and information remain within the company structures and systems.
3. Access to Niche Global Talent
GCCs thrive in regions that have high-quality, skilled professionals with specialised knowledge in an array of domains. It might be difficult to search for and identify niche talent in the home markets.
4. Enhanced innovation and R&D
GCCs are in a transformative phase, and they are emerging as hubs that foster innovation and create an environment where modern tech, analytics, and R&D are encouraged and implemented.
5. Strengthened Retention Rates
Employees working for GCCs are part of the parent company, and they share the same cultural viewpoints and purpose. The work landscape results in better engagement, as communication is smooth and easy, enabling employees to stay long-term.
Why is Choosing the Right Model Important? A Decision Framework for Global Enterprises
Selecting between Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) vs. In-House GCC is critical for enterprises, as adopting the wrong model will lead to operational disruptions, slow-paced entry in markets and regions, budget mismanagement, enhanced expenses, loss of ownership over significant functions, etc.
Choosing the right model will drive corporations to the pinnacle of success. Let us check out how:
- Impact on Expenses- If you don’t choose a model wisely, it might affect your finances, as both models demand different kinds of money allocation and investments.
- Speedy Process- If you are looking at rapid ramping up of operations, then BOT models are feasible, while in-house models will slow down the process.
- Cultural Alignment Issues- In-house GCC models can smoothly integrate with existing business culture, while BOT models might have initial cultural misalignments.
- Risk Factors- A BOT model essentially manages the initial regulatory risks during market entry, while in-house models, the parent organisation have to handle the risks independently.
How does Alp Consulting help companies Set Up GCCs through the BOT Model?
Are you planning to establish a world-class GCC? Are you experiencing GCC setup woes? Contact us at Alp Consulting Ltd, we will support you to establish high-impact GCCs through a smooth and efficient Build-Operate Transfer approach.
In the Build phase, our team at Alp assists companies with the search for a location to infrastructure set-up, to handling local regulatory matters.
The Operate phase is all about our team managing the comprehensive recruitment processes, HR activities, handling vendors, and enhancing performance.
The Transfer phase is conducted by Alp smoothly and transparently without any disruptions. The handover is ended with complete and detailed reports and documents, robust teams, and well-thought-out governance.
Key Takeaways
- The key balance point is speed versus ownership
- BOT is the fastest way to take control
- GCCS Becoming Innovation Hubs
- Important to select the right model
- Low CapEx vs High CapEx
Frequently Asked Questions
1. How long does it typically take to set up a GCC through the BOT model?
It typically takes 4 to 6 months for the initial setup of a GCC through a BOT model.
2. What skills or capabilities are required internally to build an in-house GCC successfully?
To build an in-house GCC successfully, companies must have intelligent leadership, strong governance, digital expertise, etc.
3. Can a company switch from a BOT model to full in-house operations later?
Yes, an organisation can switch from a BOT to a full-fledged in-house model later.
4. How do data security and IP protection differ between BOT and in-house GCC setups?
By adopting the in-house approach, a company will have the entire control over IP and data protection, while BOT model adoption involves sharing control with a third-party vendor in the initial stages.
5. What are the hidden costs companies should consider before choosing either model?
Some of the hidden costs organisations must consider before selecting either model are upfront investment, training and hiring costs, scalability issues, management complications, etc.
Contact Us For Business Enquiry
Kishore V N
Kishore V N is the Managing Director at ALP Consulting, bringing over 29 years of extensive experience in global recruitment, talent strategy, and workforce solutions. He has been instrumental in building scalable RPO, MSP, and modular talent sourcing models that empower organizations with a competitive edge in talent acquisition. Kishore’s leadership focuses on expanding ALP’s global presence, driving innovation in recruitment technology, and enhancing operational excellence. He also serves as Director at Datacore Technologies, steering digital HR transformation through advanced HRMS and virtual staffing solutions.
